Community Eldercare Services

Phoebe J
PBJ Takeaway: Community Eldercare Services

17 Facilities2 States100% For-ProfitAvg. Overall Rating: 1.8Avg. Staffing Rating: 2.6Staffing Rating: 2.6

Community Eldercare Services operates 17 nursing homes across 2 states, all classified as for-profit. Its average CMS overall rating is 1.8 stars.

Across the portfolio, facilities report an average of 3.50 total nurse HPRD, including 0.50 RN hours, below the national ratio of 3.77 HPRD.

71% of Community Eldercare Services facilities meet PBJ320 high-riskPBJ320 assigns nursing homes as high-risk when CMS designates them as: Special Focus Facility (SFF), SFF candidate, 1-star overall rating, or with an abuse icon. criteria (e.g. special focus facility, one-star overall, abuse icon). CMS reports a total of 21 fines ($692,980) for the chain's nursing homes.

320 Consulting
Community Eldercare Services Key Metrics
Providers
17
States
2
Avg. Rating
1.8
Total Fines
$692,980
High-Risk FacilitiesPBJ320 assigns nursing homes as high-risk when CMS designates them as: Special Focus Facility (SFF), SFF candidate, 1-star overall rating, or with an abuse icon. – Community Eldercare Services
Special Focus Facilities (SFFs)
0
SFF Candidates
1
1-Star Overall
11
Cited for Abuse
4
Avg. CMS 5-Star Rating – Community Eldercare Services
Overall
1.8
Health Inspection
2.2
Staffing
2.6
Quality Measures
1.7
Community Eldercare Services Facilities

Nursing homes affiliated with this entity. Latest quarter staffing from CMS PBJ data. Click column headers to sort.

StateProviderCityTotal HPRDRN HPRDOverall RatingStaffing Rating
MSThe Pillars of Biloxi 1 starBiloxi3.430.4312
MSLiberty Community Living Ctr 1 starLiberty3.770.3212
TNLauderdale Community Living Center 1 starRipley3.460.4111
TNOakwood Community Living CenterDyersburg3.600.4632
TNBriarwood Community Living Center 1 starLexington3.270.4411
TNRenaissance Terrace Abuse, 1 starHarriman2.760.7112
MSBruce Community Living CenterBruce3.780.5544
MSVaiden Community Living CenterVaiden3.480.7534
MSLongwood Community Living CenterBooneville3.430.7833
MSWest Point Community Living Center Abuse, 1 starWest Point3.930.4814
MSLaurelwood Community Living Center 1 starLaurel3.510.4012
MSSunplex Sub-Acute Center Abuse, 1 star, SFF CandidateOcean Springs3.480.4212
MSCourtyards Comm Living Center 1 starFulton3.600.5312
MSPlaza Community Living Center 1 starPascagoula3.540.6913
MSTishomingo Comm Living Center 1 starIuka3.590.7914
MSPleasant Hills Com Liv Center AbuseJackson3.830.6123
TNHillview Community Living CenterDresden2.990.4643
Methodology

This dashboard uses CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) data (2017–2025), along with other public datasets (Provider Information, Affiliated Entity). State staffing standards via MACPAC (2022).

Metrics

  • Hours Per Resident Day (HPRD): Total staff hours ÷ average residents. Example: 350 hours for 100 residents = 3.5 HPRD.
  • Direct Care (excl. Admin, DON): Hours per resident day for direct care staff only (RN, LPN, CNA, NAtrn, MedAide), excluding administrative and supervisory roles.
  • Contract Staff %: Share of hours provided by contract staff.
  • Census: Average number of residents during the period.

Note: Some states set minimums (e.g., NJ, CA, NY at 3.5 HPRD); a federal 3.48 minimum was recently overturned (2025). A 2001 federal study linked 4.1 HPRD to better outcomes in that study. Staffing needs vary by resident acuity (case-mix), day, and shift. Estimates on PBJ Takeaway assume roughly 60% of staff are CNAs.

Data transparency

The PBJ Dashboard pulls directly from CMS data and is carefully vetted for accuracy. Still, sometimes a bug sneaks into the jelly. That could mean: a systemic CMS data reporting issue (e.g., Q2 2017 contract staffing, missing data in 2020 due to COVID) or there could be a coding error on our part. If you spot something that looks off, please let me know via the contact form so I can set things right.

Request custom PBJ analysis for litigation and investigative reporting.Request custom PBJ analysis.