Serrano Group

Phoebe J
PBJ Takeaway: Serrano Group

11 Facilities1 States100% For-ProfitAvg. Overall Rating: 2.5Avg. Staffing Rating: 3.2Staffing Rating: 3.2

Serrano Group operates 11 nursing homes across 1 state, all classified as for-profit. Its average CMS overall rating is 2.5 stars.

Across the portfolio, facilities report an average of 4.40 total nurse HPRD, including 0.50 RN hours, above the national ratio of 3.77 HPRD.

36% of Serrano Group facilities meet PBJ320 high-riskPBJ320 assigns nursing homes as high-risk when CMS designates them as: Special Focus Facility (SFF), SFF candidate, 1-star overall rating, or with an abuse icon. criteria (e.g. special focus facility, one-star overall, abuse icon). CMS reports a total of 17 fines ($716,827) for the chain's nursing homes.

320 Consulting
Serrano Group Key Metrics
Providers
11
States
1
Avg. Rating
2.5
Total Fines
$716,827
High-Risk FacilitiesPBJ320 assigns nursing homes as high-risk when CMS designates them as: Special Focus Facility (SFF), SFF candidate, 1-star overall rating, or with an abuse icon. – Serrano Group
Special Focus Facilities (SFFs)
0
SFF Candidates
2
1-Star Overall
2
Cited for Abuse
4
Avg. CMS 5-Star Rating – Serrano Group
Overall
2.5
Health Inspection
1.8
Staffing
3.2
Quality Measures
4.6
Serrano Group Facilities

Nursing homes affiliated with this entity. Latest quarter staffing from CMS PBJ data. Click column headers to sort.

StateProviderCityTotal HPRDRN HPRDOverall RatingStaffing Rating
CARialto Post Acute CenterRialto4.590.5223
CAMonrovia Post AcuteDuarte4.630.4734
CALong Beach Healthcare Center Abuse, 1 starLong Beach4.370.3913
CACalifornia Post Acute SFF CandidateLos Angeles4.040.2722
CARoyal Terrace HealthcareDuarte4.460.4742
CARoyal Gardens HealthcareAlhambra4.490.9124
CARoyal Palms Post AcuteGlendale4.210.4224
CAPalazzo Post AcuteLos Angeles4.370.3144
CAHollywood Premier Healthcare Center Abuse, 1 starLos Angeles4.410.3112
CACorona Post Acute CenterCorona4.190.5224
CAMaclay Healthcare Center Abuse, SFF CandidateSylmar4.240.3623
Methodology

This dashboard uses CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) data (2017–2025), along with other public datasets (Provider Information, Affiliated Entity). State staffing standards via MACPAC (2022).

Metrics

  • Hours Per Resident Day (HPRD): Total staff hours ÷ average residents. Example: 350 hours for 100 residents = 3.5 HPRD.
  • Direct Care (excl. Admin, DON): Hours per resident day for direct care staff only (RN, LPN, CNA, NAtrn, MedAide), excluding administrative and supervisory roles.
  • Contract Staff %: Share of hours provided by contract staff.
  • Census: Average number of residents during the period.

Note: Some states set minimums (e.g., NJ, CA, NY at 3.5 HPRD); a federal 3.48 minimum was recently overturned (2025). A 2001 federal study linked 4.1 HPRD to better outcomes in that study. Staffing needs vary by resident acuity (case-mix), day, and shift. Estimates on PBJ Takeaway assume roughly 60% of staff are CNAs.

Data transparency

The PBJ Dashboard pulls directly from CMS data and is carefully vetted for accuracy. Still, sometimes a bug sneaks into the jelly. That could mean: a systemic CMS data reporting issue (e.g., Q2 2017 contract staffing, missing data in 2020 due to COVID) or there could be a coding error on our part. If you spot something that looks off, please let me know via the contact form so I can set things right.

Request custom PBJ analysis for litigation and investigative reporting.Request custom PBJ analysis.