67 providers • 5,628 residents • 3.47 HPRD
3.47 HPRD (rank: 48)0.59 RN HPRD11.5% contractNM Min. ~2.56 HPRD
New Mexico reported 3.47 HPRD (≈ 6.9 residents per total staff) in Q3 2025. HPRD is up 0.17 since Q3 2024. This level is below the national ratio of 3.77 HPRD and ranks #48 out of 51 states.
Put another way… On a 30-bed floor at a typical New Mexico nursing home you'd see about 4.3 staff members, including 2.7 nurse aides. For the entire 84-resident facility (New Mexico average), that's about 12.1 total staff, including 7.6 nurse aides.
New Mexico
Direct staff excludes Admin/DON. State min. (~2.56 HPRD) may reflect calculated equivalents by MACPAC. Direct staff excludes Admin/DON. State min. (~2.56 HPRD) may reflect calculated equivalents by MACPAC.
New Mexico
New Mexico
New Mexico
| Metric | Value | National Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Total Nurse Staffing HPRD | 3.47 | #48 of 51 |
| Direct Care Nurse HPRD | 3.25 | #48 of 51 |
| RN HPRD | 0.59 | #39 of 51 |
| RN Direct Care HPRD | 0.44 | #30 of 51 |
| Nurse Aide HPRD | 2.18 | #39 of 51 |
| Contract Staff Percentage | 11.5% | — |
New Mexico has facilities in the Special Focus Facility program. Select a tab to view Current SFFs, Candidates, Graduates, or facilities no longer in Medicare/Medicaid.
| Facility | Months | Residents | Total HPRD | Ownership |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Casa Real (Santa Fe) | 9 | 109 | 2.86 | For-Profit |
This dashboard uses CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) data (2017–2025), along with other public datasets (Provider Information, Affiliated Entity). State staffing standards via MACPAC (2022).
Metrics
Note: Some states set minimums (e.g., NJ, CA, NY at 3.5 HPRD); a federal 3.48 minimum was recently overturned (2025). A 2001 federal study linked 4.1 HPRD to better outcomes in that study. Staffing needs vary by resident acuity (case-mix), day, and shift. Estimates on PBJ Takeaway assume roughly 60% of staff are CNAs.
Data transparency
The PBJ Dashboard pulls directly from CMS data and is carefully vetted for accuracy. Still, sometimes a bug sneaks into the jelly. That could mean: a systemic CMS data reporting issue (e.g., Q2 2017 contract staffing, missing data in 2020 due to COVID) or there could be a coding error on our part. If you spot something that looks off, please let me know via the contact form so I can set things right.
Request custom PBJ analysis for litigation and investigative reporting.Request custom PBJ analysis.