406 providers • 35,241 residents • 3.67 HPRD
3.67 HPRD (rank: 40)0.53 RN HPRD9.0% contract
North Carolina reported 3.67 HPRD (≈ 6.5 residents per total staff) in Q3 2025. HPRD is up 0.01 since Q3 2024. This level is near the national ratio of 3.77 HPRD and ranks #40 out of 51 states.
Put another way… On a 30-bed floor at a typical North Carolina nursing home you'd see about 4.6 staff members, including 2.9 nurse aides. For the entire 87-resident facility (North Carolina average), that's about 13.3 total staff, including 8.3 nurse aides.
North Carolina
Direct staff excludes Admin/DON. Direct staff excludes Admin/DON.
North Carolina
North Carolina
North Carolina
| Metric | Value | National Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Total Nurse Staffing HPRD | 3.67 | #40 of 51 |
| Direct Care Nurse HPRD | 3.40 | #39 of 51 |
| RN HPRD | 0.53 | #45 of 51 |
| RN Direct Care HPRD | 0.33 | #45 of 51 |
| Nurse Aide HPRD | 2.29 | #33 of 51 |
| Contract Staff Percentage | 9.0% | — |
North Carolina has facilities in the Special Focus Facility program. Select a tab to view Current SFFs, Candidates, Graduates, or facilities no longer in Medicare/Medicaid.
| Facility | Months | Residents | Total HPRD | Ownership |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rockwell Park Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center (Charlotte) | 21 | 96 | 3.30 | For-Profit |
| Universal Health Care/north Raleigh (Raleigh) | 12 | 117 | 3.88 | For-Profit |
This dashboard uses CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) data (2017–2025), along with other public datasets (Provider Information, Affiliated Entity). State staffing standards via MACPAC (2022).
Metrics
Note: Some states set minimums (e.g., NJ, CA, NY at 3.5 HPRD); a federal 3.48 minimum was recently overturned (2025). A 2001 federal study linked 4.1 HPRD to better outcomes in that study. Staffing needs vary by resident acuity (case-mix), day, and shift. Estimates on PBJ Takeaway assume roughly 60% of staff are CNAs.
Data transparency
The PBJ Dashboard pulls directly from CMS data and is carefully vetted for accuracy. Still, sometimes a bug sneaks into the jelly. That could mean: a systemic CMS data reporting issue (e.g., Q2 2017 contract staffing, missing data in 2020 due to COVID) or there could be a coding error on our part. If you spot something that looks off, please let me know via the contact form so I can set things right.
Request custom PBJ analysis for litigation and investigative reporting.Request custom PBJ analysis.